Edmonton Headlines for November 17

wreathLet’s just get right to this, Edmonton.

The hastiness is mostly due to continued grogginess on my behalf, due to that delicious elixir we call NyQuil.

from the Edmonton Journal:

Don’t delay LRT route decision

Thousands petition to keep psych beds open (Don’t worry, there’s probably an even larger “silent majority” who want to close the beds.)

Election spending bill passed

And tying into that last story: Union attack ads grist for mill on the hill

Power line law amendments due

Suncor’s Firebag project generates jobs for Flint Energy

Journal argues for right to report bail hearings (This fight is now at the Supreme Court.)

from the Edmonton Sun:

A history of spending (Plans to hire a historian laureate for the city aren’t sitting well with the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.)

Convict release system flawed (So the answer is…housing?)

Schoolmate testifies killer assaulted her (This is the dangerous offender hearing for prostitute killer Thomas Svekla.)

from the Edmonton Examiner:

Community unveils two new NHL-size rinks (Not just in Daryl Katz’s backyard.)

from The Canadian Press:

Recession forcing many, for the first time, to food banks: Report

from Metro Edmonton:

Hitting them low (A big sting on dial-a-dopers.)

from 630CHED/iNews880:

Cash needed for expanded butt program (The anti-litter campaign may be expanded beyond Jasper and Whyte.)

from CBC Edmonton:

Swimmers plead for city pool (Save Scona Pool)

Alberta seniors eligible for H1N1 shots this week

Feds give Alberta $10M to fight pine beetle

from Global Edmonton:

Teskey looks for adjournment (This case will never end. Sad.)

from The Gateway (U of A):

ESA demands halt to budget cuts (Rallying today, just wait until they read this story on tuition hikes…via the Calgary Herald.)

3 Responses to “Edmonton Headlines for November 17”

  1. tricotmiss says:

    Just a thought, but if we invested in effective community supports and programs that helped people BEFORE they developed addictions and got involved with crime, perhaps we wouldn’t have over capacity prisons or need to provide housing after the fact.

  2. Jeff says:

    If by “…invested in effective community supports and programs that helped people BEFORE they developed addictions and got involved in crime” you mean “lock them up and throw away the key,” I think you’ll see that happen.

    Prevention does make sense. As does engaging people (kids) through all their downtime to ensure they don’t turn to the wrong things. That, however, can appear very wishy-washy to an “eye for an eye” crowd and a reduction in crime levels can’t compete with one or two high-profile front pages.

  3. tricotmiss says:

    Agreed. Sad though.